Redirecting the Stim: I'd Do It Again

My fourteen-year-old son Tate has autism and my eleven-year-old adopted daughter has Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS). I blog about them, the things we have done that have helped and the things that have not helped: the lessons we have learned, their siblings, classmates, teachers, IEPs, and many other things that have come with the experience of raising these special children. I do this for many reasons. I hope to help those who do not live with autism or FAS to understand a little bit better what these disabilities look like. I also try to help those who are coming after us so they can draw from some of our experiences, perhaps making their own lives just a little bit easier.

I do not claim to know everything and I often remind people that I am just a mom. I am not a doctor, an educator, or a therapist, and I am not formally trained to help anyone. I just know what autism looks like in my son and what FAS has done to my little girl. I have years of experience to share. The ideas and methods we used are not something I believe must be followed to achieve success. I know sometimes there is more than one solution to each problem we encounter and I know the individuality of a child and their family should be considered. There. This paragraph is my disclaimer. So please no messages about how I’m doing it all wrong or that I'm judging you for doing it differently...

Tate, around the time of his diagnosis

There are some things I would do exactly the same if I were doing things over again. All the early intervention we did with Tate and the Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) was absolutely invaluable. All the money we borrowed was worth it. I have been told by a few other bloggers that ABA did nothing for their child with autism but for us it was life changing. The advocate we take with us to Tate’s IEP meetings is something else I would point to as absolutely necessary. Tate has had services I would have never obtained without her help. So far no one has steam coming out their ears, right? But wait for it. Some of you will not like what I have to say about stereotypic behavior.

I have often heard, “Every behavior has a purpose.” ABA therapy revolves around this and I do not disagree. ABA also says that the stereotypic behavior serves a purpose of some kind but that behavior can be replaced with one that will serve the same purpose. In other words, "If you eliminate one stim then it will be replaced with another." I found this to be true. Tate still stims but his stims are subtle and they do not keep himself or those around him from learning or engaging in activities or with other people. It took a lot of hard work to eliminate some of Tate’s former stereotypic behaviors but I am not sorry we did it. In my opinion the hand flapping was not in Tate’s best interest.

Anytime I write about this I get objections from a few parents who do not understand why I stopped Tate from hand flapping when he was a preschooler. I hear: “It’s not hurting anyone.” And then there is: “I would never ask my child to stop doing something that was calming/comforting/pleasurable/satisfying to him/her.” Really? Are those statements even valid? What if your child were pulling his sibling’s hair? It is a behavior that he finds satisfying, right? Of course you would stop him from doing that because it hurts another person. Would you do your best to stop your child from smearing his feces? You would? Okay. You would want to stop him from doing something that was unhealthy. How about head banging? If he were banging his head on the floor over and over then would you stop him from doing that? You’d block him. You’d put a helmet on him. Is it because it is harmful to him? So there are SOME things you would try to redirect but not others. Hand flapping. Hand flapping is acceptable to you because it is not hurting your child. It is not filthy. It is not hurting a sibling. Perhaps your child can learn while he is hand flapping. Mine could not. When Tate hand flapped it did hurt him. It consumed him. It kept him from learning. Our goal was to make every minute of his day a learning experience. He could hand flap, fan the pages of a book, wave his cloth diaper in front of his face, stare at his reflection, or run “without purpose” for thirty minutes to an hour at a time. The more Tate stimmed, the more he wanted to stim. The stereotypic behavior itself was reinforcing. It was a habit. The more Tate engaged in stereotypic behaviors the less opportunities he had to engage with his peers. His peers saw the hand flapping and some of the behaviors as odd and they approached Tate less because of it. The stereotypic behaviors were sabotaging so much of Tate’s social and academic education. As difficult as it was to get four and five year olds to look past the stereotypic behaviors, I imagined it would be infinitely harder to get peers in Junior High to be understanding of it. Perhaps Tate would have just "outgrown" the behaviors like hand flapping. Some children do. But some do not. I was not willing to risk it and have to look back and wish I had tried to eliminate them. We replaced the more obvious stims with much less obvious ones that still serve the purpose he needed them for. 

Sydney, age one

Sydney came to us with stims too and I worked hard to eliminate those. Being neglected for the first ten and a half months of her life she spent much of her day rocking. The rocking had a purpose. Children who are neglected find ways to stimulate, and occupy themselves, and comfort themselves. After we got Sydney home and I knew she was provided with all the things she needed to thrive I worked constantly at gently stopping her when she rocked. It did not take very many weeks to stop the rocking. I am so thankful I did what I did as I have seen another adopted child older than Sydney who still rocks. The advice that child’s parents got was to allow the rocking because it fulfilled a need. I feel the need could have been fulfilled in other ways. I could be wrong. I'm not an expert. But in my experience with my children: the longer a behavior goes on the harder it will be to stop.

Some might think I was mean or intolerant. Some might call what I did "tough love." Once a mom who was upset with me for a blog post I wrote implied she loved her child more than I loved mine because she embraced his stimming. She said, "I love my child enough to let him stim." I wish I had said, "I loved mine enough to help him to stop." but I am never good at witty comebacks. There is no doubt in my mind that we all love our children immensely regardless of our position on this subject and others. It does not mean you are a better parent if you let your child hand flap or rock. It does not mean I am a better parent if I stop mine from doing it. We all want what is best for our children. I drew the line before some others would I am sure. Some might draw it before head banging or hair pulling but I drew it before hand flapping and rocking. And I do not regret it. I cannot go back and do it another way to try and see which way worked best. I am glad I do not have to. It was hard work. It would have been much easier in the short term to let Tate spend his days tossing his cloth diaper around and hand flapping. It would have been so much easier in the short term to let Sydney sit in her playpen and rock. But would I have kids as high functioning as I have now? What do you think?

There are a few things I have changed my opinion about and wish I had done differently. I will have a post up about that soon. I had originally thought I would talk about those things in this post too but I am told a post more than 1000 words is too long. So stay tuned…

Holding onto a "live wire"

My last post mentioned how hard it was to carry Tate when he was little. Here's the link if you are interested in reading about that: A Sack of Potatoes It was equally as hard to carry Sydney but for totally different reasons. Even holding on to Sydney was challenging. She was so hyperactive I could barely keep her from jumping out of my arms. She had no reaction to pain so she didn’t mind if she fell head-first into the floor either. She would spin around and around in my arms so I had to hang on to one of her legs at all times. Occasionally she would throw herself backward, without warning, so I always had to be prepared for that as well.  

Sydney, One Year Old

I had read that a baby who is neglected learns to find ways to stimulate themselves so I knew we’d probably see these kinds of things in Sydney. When a brain is not stimulated it becomes damaged, thus the rocking and other behaviors are used by a baby to keep themselves “entertained.” It is like self-preservation. Unfortunately, the rocking and other behaviors do not suddenly stop when the baby is removed from the neglect. We had to teach Sydney that she no longer needed those behaviors. I provided her with lots of toys and activities. The house was definitely not boring with six older brothers and sisters. I sat beside her and put my hand on her back and said “no rocking” anytime it began. If I walked through the room she was in and saw her rocking, I touched her on the shoulder, reminding her constantly, “no rocking.” It got old but I was determined. Finally, she seemed to outgrow it or maybe she just didn’t need it anymore and it stopped. Throwing herself down violently from a sitting position also stopped over time. I tried to keep her on a soft surface, in the play pen or with pillows behind her so the crash to the floor wouldn’t hurt as badly in the meantime. Those crashes were so hard to watch. Occasionally, she knocked her head on the floor hard enough to stun herself. 

When Sydney came to us, she also sucked two middle fingers. It was adorable. I read and heard from many people that thumb sucking should be stopped at an early age because an older child was much harder to break of it. It was so cute while she was little but I knew that it would not be cute when she was older. I also figured Sydney would have enough to deal with when she started school and sucking on her fingers would be one more thing to cause her to look different than her peers. So…. I began that battle once the rocking had stopped. I felt mean and rotten asking her to take her fingers out of her mouth constantly. I read all kinds of remedies. I didn’t like any of them. I wasn’t going to put hot sauce on my baby’s fingers! During waking hours I was usually able to keep Sydney busy enough to keep the fingers out of her mouth but naps and night time were much more difficult. I tried pulling a pair of her brother’s long socks onto her hands and pinning them at the shoulders.  That worked usually, although sometimes she was able to wiggle her hands out and find those fingers. She really didn’t seem to miss sucking on them when they were not available though. When I look back on those days I still feel so mean, however I would do it again. There is a child I see a couple of times a week this year when I volunteer at Sydney’s school. The child often had two fingers in the mouth. A seven-year-old looks very immature when they are sucking their thumb or fingers during a spelling test. 

Sydney’s had a few other habits we’ve had to break. When she came to us, she picked at the ends of her fingers and toes until they bled. Can you imagine being so bored in a crib that you had resorted to causing yourself pain just so you would feel SOMETHING? I cannot. Keeping her feet covered and putting the socks on her hands helped keep her digits healed. Because I bite my nails myself, I have not been a good example in this area. I feel like a hypocrite anytime I ask Sydney to leave her fingers alone. She rarely causes them to bleed now. Sometimes when she is stressed I see her fingers suffer though. I have blogged before about Tate’s stims and said when we reduce or eradicate one, he often replaces it with another. Sydney does this too. While trying to eliminate the finger-picking, she began chewing on her hair. She came to us with short hair but it had grown quite long in a short time. Her hair was so pretty when it was clean and combed. I loved it long and tried everything I could think of to help her remember to keep it out of her mouth. She would hide and chew on it and she always sucked on it while she slept. She replaced her finger sucking with hair chewing. I had to cut her hair and we still keep it short. As soon as it gets long enough to reach with her mouth, it starts all over again. Just this morning I had to give her a shower and wash her hair before school because I couldn’t get a comb through the sticky hair. 

There are other bad habits and some of them are awful, while some are sort of endearing. I have blogged before about Sydney’s hoarding and the hiding of food. (See my blog post called Hoarding) Then there is the love of mulch and the visual stim she has. She brings every toy, block, pencil, or book she picks up, right up to the tip of her nose so she can spin the item right in front of her eyes. Many people have asked me why Sydney smells everything she picks up. It might look like she is sniffing things because her nose is right there but it is actually a visual thing. She picks something up by the edge or corner, using the tips of two fingers, and barely holding on to it at all, she brings it up to her face and spins it back and forth a couple of times. It looks very ritualistic. If she is building with legos, each and every lego comes up to her face. If I ask her to stop then she is quickly done playing legos. She seems to NEED to do this, much like Tate NEEDS to whisper the last few words of his sentence when he is finished talking to me. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder you say? Probably, says the doctor, at the very least, some kind of anxiety disorder. 

Note:

In my posts I often refer to Tate and Sydney’s “stimming” or “stims.” “Stimming” is short for self-stimulatory behavior(s) and are almost always present in a child with autism. It is also called stereotypic behavior.  It might be finger wiggling, hand flapping, rocking, spinning something, or any other repetitive movements. It could also be a vocal thing, like repeating words or squealing. People with autism might stim when they are bored, excited, anxious, or uncomfortable. These behaviors are not exclusive to people with autism. Do you tap your pencil, bounce your leg, bite your nails or twirl your hair? Those are also stims. A stim is not always a terrible thing that needs to be extinguished. An infant who sucks his thumb may need the stimulation while he is small. When he gets older, the thumb sucking will get in the way of activities, possibly spread germs, and look odd to his peers, so his mom will work on replacing the thumb sucking with something more appropriate. A child with autism gets caught up in a stim and uses it to shut out everything else. The stim takes away from learning opportunities and social interactions. Most of the stims Tate has had over the years have been things that needed to be minimized or eliminated.

Tate’s stimming began when he was around two years old when he lost his language and regressed. It is a result of autism, while Sydney’s stims are probably a result of neglect and an anxiety disorder.

To learn more about stimming see my post called Echoes from April 19, 2012.

Like what you read? Want to become a follower? Click on the Google Friend Following gadget on this blog. It's over on the right side and asks you to subscribe. Or you can add the URL (the web address in your search bar) to your Reading List. You can do that by clicking the plus sign in front of the URL. Thanks! Find us on Facebook at Quirks and Chaos