Since my last post, Thank You to The Class of 2020, I have had numerous requests from people asking me to describe the lunch buddy program. The following describes Tate's lunch buddy program. Part of the beauty of a lunch buddy program is that it can be "tailored to fit" and changed as needed.
I
first heard of lunch buddies when I was at an autism conference before Tate
ever began school. As soon as I heard the program described I was “sold” on the
idea. I began asking for a program for Tate when he started first grade. After
we discussed the lunch buddy program at a meeting and considered it for first
grade, it was agreed that we would wait and begin it in second grade. There
were several reasons involved. We already had several social skills “programs”
in place that first year of all-day public school and they were very
time-consuming for the staff. The speech teacher had launched a social skills
group for Tate, pulling peers from his class two or three times a week to play
games and encourage Tate to interact with his peers. We had an adult coach with
Tate at recess prompting him to play with peers so he would not wander aimlessly,
isolated or lost in repetitive behaviors. Tate was struggling to learn the
names of his classmates so photographs of all his classmates were obtained and
he practiced naming them and matching children to their names as part of his
day. The school staff was working hard on so many things that the lunch buddy
program was put off.
When
Tate began second grade, at my insistence the lunch buddies program was added. The
purpose of the lunch buddy program was for Tate to learn social skills that he
could then generalize into other settings. Our hope was to teach Tate skills by
coaching him and eventually fading the prompts. Let me be clear: a lunch buddy
program by itself is not going to teach your child all the social skills they
need to learn. It is one of many things we have done to help Tate learn social
skills. The skills he has learned from the lunch buddy program have been
reinforced over and over throughout his day since we began the program.
Mastering skills was not something accomplished in one year. Tate has had a
lunch buddy program for five years and it has taken a very long time to see a
lot of results.
Buddies |
The
lunch buddy program has been successful, in that Tate can sit amongst friends
in a lunch setting and be fairly comfortable. Tate has learned skills and the
coach has been faded much of the time. Tate still has autism but he is able to
handle himself and respond appropriately in so many situations now due to all
this coaching. As it turns out I often hear from the parents of the typically
developing children who have participated that their children have learned so
much from Tate. They are thankful that their children have learned about autism
and have
become very comfortable around my child with special needs. Among the things these children have learned are compassion, understanding, patience and perseverance. They also have a pretty good idea about what autism is and could probably generalize what they have learned to interact with other people with special needs.
I
am a firm believer that the children who participated should be told about my
child’s disability. I do not believe the lunch buddy program would have been
successful for us without the full-disclosure that I insisted upon. Explaining
WHY Tate is different than they are and WHY Tate NEEDS so much more instruction
than they do was key. Children who are educated about autism are far less
likely to bully a child with autism in my opinion. I do not have statistics on
this. I did what made sense to me. I insisted from first grade on that Tate’s
classmates be told that Tate has autism and then given an age appropriate
definition of autism. I wrote a personalized definition with illustrations in a
picture book format for the kids. It started out very simply in first grade and
got a little more detailed with each passing year. See the book in my post: What is Autism. When
Tate was in first grade I wrote a note to parents that went home in the first
graders’ backpacks, explaining autism and letting them know their child had a
classmate with autism. I wanted to take the mystery out of the reasons that
Tate was followed around by a Para-Professional throughout his day. I wanted
parents to be ready with an answer if--and when--their child came home and asked
questions about Tate.
The
lunch buddy program has evolved a lot over the years. We learned what worked
and what did not and tweaked it as we went. In grade school there were parent permission
slips that had to be signed so the students could participate. Tate’s whole
class wanted to be involved and got those permission slips back quickly. The
kids LOVED teaching Tate. When we began, in second grade it started with
one teacher or Para-Professional sitting with Tate amongst several of his
peers. His peers were coached before lunch some on how to try to involve Tate
in their conversations. Tate was very hard to engage back then. He would talk
to adults but not children easily. The kids would ask him questions they
had rehearsed with a teacher in a short meeting. A peer might ask Tate, “Do
you have pets?” Tate would answer, “Yes”. The adult would maybe have to whisper
to Tate and tell him what to say next. So Tate might be coached to say, “I
have a dog and two cats.” The peer would respond appropriately and maybe ask
the names of the pets. The adult coach would push Tate to answer questions and
then reciprocate to the child who had done the asking. So Tate would be told to
ask, “Do YOU have any pets?” It was amazing to see the difference in the
typically developing children and Tate. The peers just knew how to respond and
keep a conversation going, whereas Tate had to be told. The peers knew
they should reciprocate with another question and keep the “ball bouncing”
while Tate did not. Heavy prompts had to be used for Tate back then. After
trying these very scripted types of things and Tate not making a whole lot of
progress, it was determined that the lunchroom setting was pretty overwhelming
for Tate. So, instead of the noisy lunchroom, they moved to a classroom or the
library where it was quiet and Tate would be more comfortable. Tate never eats
a school lunch and has taken the same lunch from home for seven long years
(peanut butter sandwich-no jelly, chips and a couple of cookies.) The kids that
wanted to participate in the lunch buddy program after that first year would
bring a sack lunch and commit to being a lunch buddy for a week at a time.
Usually there were two or three kids who would eat with Tate for a week. The
kids’ questions and conversation starters were scripted with note cards
beside them or even written on a placemat. The kids got so good at doing
this that a lot of times the “cheat sheets” were not used. The students
became therapist themselves and the teacher would often sit back amazed at
how well the kids were doing. Conversation skills are not the only thing that
is worked on during lunch. Posture and body language is also constantly
targeted. Keeping Tate from stimming with his hands and fingers and just
looking odd in general has been a huge part of the lunch buddy program.
These two boys are always good to Tate. |
Because
recess came right after lunch the program was carried over into the noon
recess. The lunch buddies were asked to try to engage Tate in play at recess
too. Tate often declined or tried to decline but his adult coach was right
there encouraging him to participate in the peer activities.
For
sixth grade Tate and his class moved to the junior high. The lunch buddy
program continued. Tate and his lunch buddy group sat in the lunchroom that
year, but at a table off to the side. It was still noisy and a bit overwhelming
but doable. An adult was present every day but if the kids could keep the
conversation going and Tate interacting the teacher was able to sit back and
watch.
This
year Tate is in seventh grade. Tate is sitting at the long tables with his
peers three days a week with a teacher observing from a distance. If he becomes
distressed or looks overwhelmed they go in and “rescue” the situation but
the kids are always friendly and willing to help Tate too if they can. Two days
a week the lunch buddies are back at the small table off to the side with a
peer or two and a teacher. They are working on reciprocity and the coach is
prompting Tate when necessary to ask APPROPRIATE questions and not just
repeat the same question that was asked of him. (Read my blog post on
reciprocity.) One day each week a Resource Room teacher is the adult at the
table and one day a week the speech pathologist is the adult at the table.
Tate with two fantastic teachers, 6th grade |
There
are a lot of variables involved in a successful lunch buddy program. I have
mentioned the education of the students so they understand the child’s
disability as one of these variables. Another is very obvious. You must have
students willing to participate. We were lucky. The kids LIKED being Tate’s
teachers. It made them feel important. The staff involved often praised these
kids and let them know what a difference they were making. When Tate was in
grade school I occasionally took donuts to the kids who were participating in
the program. Without the kids motivated to help there would have been no
success. Another must, also an obvious one, is a staff that is excited about
the program. If the staff had not jumped on board and made the lunch buddy
program FUN and interesting then the peer models would NOT have been motivated to
participate. Tate has been blessed with several rock-star teachers who love
their jobs. Lastly, I
had to be vested in the idea. I pushed and pushed and pushed
some more for social skills teaching in every IEP meeting we had and
followed
up to make sure things were happening. Let me insert here. I have had good
relationships with almost all of Tate’s teachers and Para-Professionals. Had we
been using our energy to argue instead of using it to help Tate then the lunch
buddy program would have probably failed.
One
more disclaimer here: Tate still has autism. Tate’s social skills are still
very poor compared to his peers. He still is not really keeping up his
half of a friendship with these kids at all.
Tate has peers that are so good to him and so friendly but he does not have
nearly as much interest in them as he should. He is sometimes even rude to them
because of his poor social skills. We have seen VAST improvement though because
of the lunch buddy program. I remember reading when Tate was newly diagnosed
that it would take hundreds of repetitive trials to teach him the things that
other children were just absorbing from their environment. Tate has had over
nine hundred of these lunches with his peer models and adult coaches at this
point. I am confident I can say that I would be living with a “different” Tate
had he not had this program in place.
You might also like to read: A Friend is a Guy Who Likes You.
Find me on Facebook at Quirks and Chaos. Like what you read? Want to become a follower? Click on the Google Friend Following gadget on this blog. It's over on the right side and asks you to subscribe. Or you can add the URL (the web address in your search bar) to your Reading List. You can do that by clicking the plus sign in front of the URL. Thanks!